High PR back links are better then low pr back links. Would a site rank better if you didn't use all these low pr forum back links? Say you just used high pr back links from Google Plus, Google Blogs, face book and You Tube Ect. I have thousands of low pr back links and I just think it lowers the value. If I ever buy a new domain I'm going to try only high pr back links. What do you guy think?
Liberty SoftWash said
Aug 12, 2015
I think google changes the game to much to really understands what works anymore.
Jeff Thompson said
Aug 13, 2015
I don't understand how this works. For those who do thats great, for those who don't our only choice is to pay someone......who in the end probably doesn't know as much as you hoped they would. My guy told me paying for SEO is a hit and miss proposition, so I don't. But that adding content whether its blogging or changing up pages, adding pictures that makes google take note, so I do, because I can't afford an SEO campaign.
Art O said
Aug 13, 2015
I moved this to OnTheSide, Maybe we will get more comments
High PR back links are better then low pr back links. Would a site rank better if you didn't use all these low pr forum back links? Say you just used high pr back links from Google Plus, Google Blogs, face book and You Tube Ect. I have thousands of low pr back links and I just think it lowers the value. If I ever buy a new domain I'm going to try only high pr back links. What do you guy think?